Skip to content
  • Alexander Popov's avatar
    gcc-plugins/stackleak: Use asm instrumentation to avoid useless register saving · feee1b8c
    Alexander Popov authored
    The kernel code instrumentation in stackleak gcc plugin works in two stages.
    At first, stack tracking is added to GIMPLE representation of every function
    (except some special cases). And later, when stack frame size info is
    available, stack tracking is removed from the RTL representation of the
    functions with small stack frame. There is an unwanted side-effect for these
    functions: some of them do useless work with caller-saved registers.
    
    As an example of such case, proc_sys_write without() instrumentation:
        55                      push   %rbp
        41 b8 01 00 00 00       mov    $0x1,%r8d
        48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
        e8 11 ff ff ff          callq  ffffffff81284610 <proc_sys_call_handler>
        5d                      pop    %rbp
        c3                      retq
        0f 1f 44 00 00          nopl   0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
        66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00    nopw   %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
        00 00 00
    
    proc_sys_write() with instrumentation:
        55                      push   %rbp
        48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
        41 56                   push   %r14
        41 55                   push   %r13
        41 54                   push   %r12
        53                      push   %rbx
        49 89 f4                mov    %rsi,%r12
        48 89 fb                mov    %rdi,%rbx
        49 89 d5                mov    %rdx,%r13
        49 89 ce                mov    %rcx,%r14
        4c 89 f1                mov    %r14,%rcx
        4c 89 ea                mov    %r13,%rdx
        4c 89 e6                mov    %r12,%rsi
        48 89 df                mov    %rbx,%rdi
        41 b8 01 00 00 00       mov    $0x1,%r8d
        e8 f2 fe ff ff          callq  ffffffff81298e80 <proc_sys_call_handler>
        5b                      pop    %rbx
        41 5c                   pop    %r12
        41 5d                   pop    %r13
        41 5e                   pop    %r14
        5d                      pop    %rbp
        c3                      retq
        66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00    nopw   0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
        00 00
    
    Let's improve the instrumentation to avoid this:
    
    1. Make stackleak_track_stack() save all register that it works with.
    Use no_caller_saved_registers attribute for that function. This attribute
    is available for x86_64 and i386 starting from gcc-7.
    
    2. Insert calling stackleak_track_stack() in asm:
      asm volatile("call stackleak_track_stack" :: "r" (current_stack_pointer))
    Here we use ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT trick from arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h.
    The input constraint is taken into account during gcc shrink-wrapping
    optimization. It is needed to be sure that stackleak_track_stack() call is
    inserted after the prologue of the containing function, when the stack
    frame is prepared.
    
    This work is a deep reengineering of the idea described on grsecurity blog
      https://grsecurity.net/resolving_an_unfortunate_stackleak_interaction
    
    
    
    Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
    Acked-by: default avatarMiguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200624123330.83226-5-alex.popov@linux.com
    
    
    Signed-off-by: default avatarKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
    feee1b8c