-
Stanislav Lisovskiy authored
Lot of tests fail, when assertion checking how many vblanks should have passed during suspend/resume is compared to magic value 150. At the same time even for failed cases, sometimes it is clearly visible that there were no issue - simply suspend took longer on that machine. If suspend took around 10 s and we get roughly 60 vblanks per second the value then should be around 600 and not 150. This change removes 150 magic value and starts to use calculation of what it is expected to be instead of being hardcoded. v2: Add possible error delta interval, where expected vblanks must lie, i.e: [estimated_vblanks - err, estimated_vblanks + err] v3: Made an error range for estimated vblanks a bit less strict. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104894 Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
86c207e3