Commit 2cad4018 authored by Fengguang Wu's avatar Fengguang Wu Committed by Linus Torvalds
Browse files

readahead: make context readahead more conservative

This helps performance on moderately dense random reads on SSD.

Transaction-Per-Second numbers provided by Taobao:

		QPS	case
		7536	disable context readahead totally
w/ patch:	7129	slower size rampup and start RA on the 3rd read
		6717	slower size rampup
w/o patch:	5581	unmodified context readahead

Before, readahead will be started whenever reading page N+1 when it happen
to read N recently.  After patch, we'll only start readahead when *three*
random reads happen to access pages N, N+1, N+2.  The probability of this
happening is extremely low for pure random reads, unless they are very
dense, which actually deserves some readahead.

Also start with a smaller readahead window.  The impact to interleaved
sequential reads should be small, because for a long run stream, the the
small readahead window rampup phase is negletable.

The context readahead actually benefits clustered random reads on HDD
whose seek cost is pretty high.  However as SSD is increasingly used for
random read workloads it's better for the context readahead to concentrate
on interleaved sequential reads.

Another SSD rand read test from Miao

        # file size:        2GB
        # read IO amount: 625MB
        sysbench --test=fileio          \
                --max-requests=10000    \
                --num-threads=1         \
                --file-num=1            \
                --file-block-size=64K   \
                --file-test-mode=rndrd  \
                --file-fsync-freq=0     \
                --file-fsync-end=off    run

shows the performance of btrfs grows up from 69MB/s to 121MB/s, ext4 from
104MB/s to 121MB/s.
Signed-off-by: default avatarWu Fengguang <>
Tested-by: default avatarTao Ma <>
Tested-by: default avatarMiao Xie <>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <>
parent 139c2d75
......@@ -371,10 +371,10 @@ static int try_context_readahead(struct address_space *mapping,
size = count_history_pages(mapping, ra, offset, max);
* no history pages:
* not enough history pages:
* it could be a random read
if (!size)
if (size <= req_size)
return 0;
......@@ -385,8 +385,8 @@ static int try_context_readahead(struct address_space *mapping,
size *= 2;
ra->start = offset;
ra->size = get_init_ra_size(size + req_size, max);
ra->async_size = ra->size;
ra->size = min(size + req_size, max);
ra->async_size = 1;
return 1;
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment