From 0c03eca3d995e73d691edea8c787e25929ec156d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 00:47:11 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] net: fib: fix incorrect call_rcu_bh()
After IP route cache removal, I believe rcu_bh() has very little use and
we should remove this RCU variant, since it adds some cycles in fast
path.
Anyway, the call_rcu_bh() use in fib_true is obviously wrong, since
some users only assert rcu_read_lock().
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
net/ipv4/fib_trie.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
index f0cdb30921c0b..57bd978483e1f 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static void __leaf_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
static inline void free_leaf(struct leaf *l)
{
- call_rcu_bh(&l->rcu, __leaf_free_rcu);
+ call_rcu(&l->rcu, __leaf_free_rcu);
}
static inline void free_leaf_info(struct leaf_info *leaf)
--
GitLab