From 3d5ede6f776bdb1483bcd086f79c3bf41fed3865 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 22:46:13 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] uml: stub needs to tolerate SIGWINCH We lost the marking of SIGWINCH as being OK to receive during stub execution, causing a panic should that happen. Cc: Benedict Verheyen <benedict.verheyen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> --- arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c b/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c index 6be028ca1817c..172ad8f72e12e 100644 --- a/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c +++ b/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static int ptrace_dump_regs(int pid) * Signals that are OK to receive in the stub - we'll just continue it. * SIGWINCH will happen when UML is inside a detached screen. */ -#define STUB_SIG_MASK (1 << SIGVTALRM) +#define STUB_SIG_MASK ((1 << SIGVTALRM) | (1 << SIGWINCH)) /* Signals that the stub will finish with - anything else is an error */ #define STUB_DONE_MASK (1 << SIGTRAP) -- GitLab