From 4f4f2ba9c531b3d7cee293dd3654ba3b86e7d220 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 14:46:19 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] mm: clarify why we want kmalloc before falling backto
vmallock
While converting drm_[cm]alloc* helpers to kvmalloc* variants Chris
Wilson has wondered why we want to try kmalloc before vmalloc fallback
even for larger allocations requests. Let's clarify that one larger
physically contiguous block is less likely to fragment memory than many
scattered pages which can prevent more large blocks from being created.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170517080932.21423-1-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/util.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
index 464df34899031..26be6407abd7e 100644
--- a/mm/util.c
+++ b/mm/util.c
@@ -357,8 +357,11 @@ void *kvmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)
WARN_ON_ONCE((flags & GFP_KERNEL) != GFP_KERNEL);
/*
- * Make sure that larger requests are not too disruptive - no OOM
- * killer and no allocation failure warnings as we have a fallback
+ * We want to attempt a large physically contiguous block first because
+ * it is less likely to fragment multiple larger blocks and therefore
+ * contribute to a long term fragmentation less than vmalloc fallback.
+ * However make sure that larger requests are not too disruptive - no
+ * OOM killer and no allocation failure warnings as we have a fallback.
*/
if (size > PAGE_SIZE) {
kmalloc_flags |= __GFP_NOWARN;
--
GitLab