From ad1ede127760d6ca4903f44dfe1a8a38b3bfb36c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andre Detsch <adetsch@br.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:01:54 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/spufs: better placement of spu affinity reference
context
This patch adjusts the placement of a reference context from
a spu affinity chain. The reference context can now be placed
only on nodes that have enough spus not intended to be used by
another gang (already running on the node).
Signed-off-by: Andre Detsch <adetsch@br.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
index f293963cd855a..2deeeba7eccfc 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
@@ -312,10 +312,27 @@ static struct spu *aff_ref_location(struct spu_context *ctx, int mem_aff,
*/
node = cpu_to_node(raw_smp_processor_id());
for (n = 0; n < MAX_NUMNODES; n++, node++) {
+ int available_spus;
+
node = (node < MAX_NUMNODES) ? node : 0;
if (!node_allowed(ctx, node))
continue;
+
+ available_spus = 0;
mutex_lock(&cbe_spu_info[node].list_mutex);
+ list_for_each_entry(spu, &cbe_spu_info[node].spus, cbe_list) {
+ if (spu->ctx && spu->ctx->gang
+ && spu->ctx->aff_offset == 0)
+ available_spus -=
+ (spu->ctx->gang->contexts - 1);
+ else
+ available_spus++;
+ }
+ if (available_spus < ctx->gang->contexts) {
+ mutex_unlock(&cbe_spu_info[node].list_mutex);
+ continue;
+ }
+
list_for_each_entry(spu, &cbe_spu_info[node].spus, cbe_list) {
if ((!mem_aff || spu->has_mem_affinity) &&
sched_spu(spu)) {
--
GitLab