From c0c641d77b9ab0da798ca86d34d2327d6f427f4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 17:18:13 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] mm: zswap: clean up confusing comment
Correct wording and change one duplicated word (it) to "it is".
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201221042848.13980-1-rdunlap@infradead.org
Fixes: 0ab0abcf5115 ("mm/zswap: refactor the get/put routines")
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/zswap.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
index 182f6ad5aa69f..1e41c28570683 100644
--- a/mm/zswap.c
+++ b/mm/zswap.c
@@ -1022,10 +1022,10 @@ static int zswap_writeback_entry(struct zpool *pool, unsigned long handle)
/*
* if we get here due to ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_EXIST
- * a load may happening concurrently
- * it is safe and okay to not free the entry
+ * a load may be happening concurrently.
+ * it is safe and okay to not free the entry.
* if we free the entry in the following put
- * it it either okay to return !0
+ * it is also okay to return !0
*/
fail:
spin_lock(&tree->lock);
--
GitLab