diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c
index 2c8baa0c2c4e11f2b5d1c39d4c3ad795d634135a..ceec21bd30c4fc5c49ad4c4bdbfe9bd031005809 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c
@@ -1364,7 +1364,18 @@ static int atmel_smc_nand_prepare_smcconf(struct atmel_nand *nand,
 	ret = atmel_smc_cs_conf_set_timing(smcconf,
 					   ATMEL_HSMC_TIMINGS_TADL_SHIFT,
 					   ncycles);
-	if (ret)
+	/*
+	 * Version 4 of the ONFI spec mandates that tADL be at least 400
+	 * nanoseconds, but, depending on the master clock rate, 400 ns may not
+	 * fit in the tADL field of the SMC reg. We need to relax the check and
+	 * accept the -ERANGE return code.
+	 *
+	 * Note that previous versions of the ONFI spec had a lower tADL_min
+	 * (100 or 200 ns). It's not clear why this timing constraint got
+	 * increased but it seems most NANDs are fine with values lower than
+	 * 400ns, so we should be safe.
+	 */
+	if (ret && ret != -ERANGE)
 		return ret;
 
 	ncycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(conf->timings.sdr.tAR_min, mckperiodps);
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c
index 03a0d057bf2f80b3ea4c3f397eb1f607697aad3c..e4211c3cc49b2ac054a080fd34d83db56f9556da 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c
@@ -2373,6 +2373,7 @@ static int __init ns_init_module(void)
         return 0;
 
 err_exit:
+	nandsim_debugfs_remove(nand);
 	free_nandsim(nand);
 	nand_release(nsmtd);
 	for (i = 0;i < ARRAY_SIZE(nand->partitions); ++i)