From e209cb51bfcceda7519b8ba1094c8ba41a658ce8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yue Hu <huyue2@yulong.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 17:37:53 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: Remove update_lock comment from struct
sugov_policy definition
Currently, update_lock is also used in sugov_update_single_freq().
The comment is not helpful anymore.
Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@yulong.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Subject edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 68fd485504a69..fe7df039ce9e9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ struct sugov_policy {
struct sugov_tunables *tunables;
struct list_head tunables_hook;
- raw_spinlock_t update_lock; /* For shared policies */
+ raw_spinlock_t update_lock;
u64 last_freq_update_time;
s64 freq_update_delay_ns;
unsigned int next_freq;
--
GitLab