Commit f1712c73 authored by Eric Dumazet's avatar Eric Dumazet Committed by David S. Miller
Browse files

can: Fix kernel panic at security_sock_rcv_skb



Zhang Yanmin reported crashes [1] and provided a patch adding a
synchronize_rcu() call in can_rx_unregister()

The main problem seems that the sockets themselves are not RCU
protected.

If CAN uses RCU for delivery, then sockets should be freed only after
one RCU grace period.

Recent kernels could use sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_RCU_FREE), but let's
ease stable backports with the following fix instead.

[1]
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
IP: [<ffffffff81495e25>] selinux_socket_sock_rcv_skb+0x65/0x2a0

Call Trace:
 <IRQ>
 [<ffffffff81485d8c>] security_sock_rcv_skb+0x4c/0x60
 [<ffffffff81d55771>] sk_filter+0x41/0x210
 [<ffffffff81d12913>] sock_queue_rcv_skb+0x53/0x3a0
 [<ffffffff81f0a2b3>] raw_rcv+0x2a3/0x3c0
 [<ffffffff81f06eab>] can_rcv_filter+0x12b/0x370
 [<ffffffff81f07af9>] can_receive+0xd9/0x120
 [<ffffffff81f07beb>] can_rcv+0xab/0x100
 [<ffffffff81d362ac>] __netif_receive_skb_core+0xd8c/0x11f0
 [<ffffffff81d36734>] __netif_receive_skb+0x24/0xb0
 [<ffffffff81d37f67>] process_backlog+0x127/0x280
 [<ffffffff81d36f7b>] net_rx_action+0x33b/0x4f0
 [<ffffffff810c88d4>] __do_softirq+0x184/0x440
 [<ffffffff81f9e86c>] do_softirq_own_stack+0x1c/0x30
 <EOI>
 [<ffffffff810c76fb>] do_softirq.part.18+0x3b/0x40
 [<ffffffff810c8bed>] do_softirq+0x1d/0x20
 [<ffffffff81d30085>] netif_rx_ni+0xe5/0x110
 [<ffffffff8199cc87>] slcan_receive_buf+0x507/0x520
 [<ffffffff8167ef7c>] flush_to_ldisc+0x21c/0x230
 [<ffffffff810e3baf>] process_one_work+0x24f/0x670
 [<ffffffff810e44ed>] worker_thread+0x9d/0x6f0
 [<ffffffff810e4450>] ? rescuer_thread+0x480/0x480
 [<ffffffff810ebafc>] kthread+0x12c/0x150
 [<ffffffff81f9ccef>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
Reported-by: default avatarZhang Yanmin <yanmin.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: default avatarOliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent dc97a89e
......@@ -45,10 +45,9 @@ struct can_proto {
extern int can_proto_register(const struct can_proto *cp);
extern void can_proto_unregister(const struct can_proto *cp);
extern int can_rx_register(struct net_device *dev, canid_t can_id,
canid_t mask,
void (*func)(struct sk_buff *, void *),
void *data, char *ident);
int can_rx_register(struct net_device *dev, canid_t can_id, canid_t mask,
void (*func)(struct sk_buff *, void *),
void *data, char *ident, struct sock *sk);
extern void can_rx_unregister(struct net_device *dev, canid_t can_id,
canid_t mask,
......
......@@ -445,6 +445,7 @@ static struct hlist_head *find_rcv_list(canid_t *can_id, canid_t *mask,
* @func: callback function on filter match
* @data: returned parameter for callback function
* @ident: string for calling module identification
* @sk: socket pointer (might be NULL)
*
* Description:
* Invokes the callback function with the received sk_buff and the given
......@@ -468,7 +469,7 @@ static struct hlist_head *find_rcv_list(canid_t *can_id, canid_t *mask,
*/
int can_rx_register(struct net_device *dev, canid_t can_id, canid_t mask,
void (*func)(struct sk_buff *, void *), void *data,
char *ident)
char *ident, struct sock *sk)
{
struct receiver *r;
struct hlist_head *rl;
......@@ -496,6 +497,7 @@ int can_rx_register(struct net_device *dev, canid_t can_id, canid_t mask,
r->func = func;
r->data = data;
r->ident = ident;
r->sk = sk;
hlist_add_head_rcu(&r->list, rl);
d->entries++;
......@@ -520,8 +522,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(can_rx_register);
static void can_rx_delete_receiver(struct rcu_head *rp)
{
struct receiver *r = container_of(rp, struct receiver, rcu);
struct sock *sk = r->sk;
kmem_cache_free(rcv_cache, r);
if (sk)
sock_put(sk);
}
/**
......@@ -596,8 +601,11 @@ void can_rx_unregister(struct net_device *dev, canid_t can_id, canid_t mask,
spin_unlock(&can_rcvlists_lock);
/* schedule the receiver item for deletion */
if (r)
if (r) {
if (r->sk)
sock_hold(r->sk);
call_rcu(&r->rcu, can_rx_delete_receiver);
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(can_rx_unregister);
......
......@@ -50,13 +50,14 @@
struct receiver {
struct hlist_node list;
struct rcu_head rcu;
canid_t can_id;
canid_t mask;
unsigned long matches;
void (*func)(struct sk_buff *, void *);
void *data;
char *ident;
struct sock *sk;
struct rcu_head rcu;
};
#define CAN_SFF_RCV_ARRAY_SZ (1 << CAN_SFF_ID_BITS)
......
......@@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@ static int bcm_rx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg,
err = can_rx_register(dev, op->can_id,
REGMASK(op->can_id),
bcm_rx_handler, op,
"bcm");
"bcm", sk);
op->rx_reg_dev = dev;
dev_put(dev);
......@@ -1225,7 +1225,7 @@ static int bcm_rx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg,
} else
err = can_rx_register(NULL, op->can_id,
REGMASK(op->can_id),
bcm_rx_handler, op, "bcm");
bcm_rx_handler, op, "bcm", sk);
if (err) {
/* this bcm rx op is broken -> remove it */
list_del(&op->list);
......
......@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ static inline int cgw_register_filter(struct cgw_job *gwj)
{
return can_rx_register(gwj->src.dev, gwj->ccgw.filter.can_id,
gwj->ccgw.filter.can_mask, can_can_gw_rcv,
gwj, "gw");
gwj, "gw", NULL);
}
static inline void cgw_unregister_filter(struct cgw_job *gwj)
......
......@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static int raw_enable_filters(struct net_device *dev, struct sock *sk,
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
err = can_rx_register(dev, filter[i].can_id,
filter[i].can_mask,
raw_rcv, sk, "raw");
raw_rcv, sk, "raw", sk);
if (err) {
/* clean up successfully registered filters */
while (--i >= 0)
......@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static int raw_enable_errfilter(struct net_device *dev, struct sock *sk,
if (err_mask)
err = can_rx_register(dev, 0, err_mask | CAN_ERR_FLAG,
raw_rcv, sk, "raw");
raw_rcv, sk, "raw", sk);
return err;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment