From 36e3deae8ba84865fd9eb3f2f21bbc00d49b7544 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 02:52:55 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] ipv6 route: Fix route lifetime in netlink message. 1) We may have route lifetime larger than INT_MAX. In that case we had wired value in lifetime. Use INT_MAX if lifetime does not fit in s32. 2) Lifetime is valid iif RTF_EXPIRES is set. Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> --- net/ipv6/route.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c index 220cffe9e63b..d1f3e19b06c7 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/route.c +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c @@ -2196,8 +2196,12 @@ static int rt6_fill_node(struct sk_buff *skb, struct rt6_info *rt, NLA_PUT_U32(skb, RTA_PRIORITY, rt->rt6i_metric); - expires = (rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_EXPIRES) ? - rt->rt6i_expires - jiffies : 0; + if (!(rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_EXPIRES)) + expires = 0; + else if (rt->rt6i_expires - jiffies < INT_MAX) + expires = rt->rt6i_expires - jiffies; + else + expires = INT_MAX; if (rtnl_put_cacheinfo(skb, &rt->u.dst, 0, 0, 0, expires, rt->u.dst.error) < 0) -- GitLab