It is possible for malicious userspace to set TCF_EM_SIMPLE bit
even for matches that should not have this bit set.

This can fool two places using tcf_em_is_simple()

1) tcf_em_tree_destroy() -> memory leak of em->data
   if ops->destroy() is NULL

2) tcf_em_tree_dump() wrongly report/leak 4 low-order bytes
   of a kernel pointer.

BUG: memory leak
unreferenced object 0xffff888121850a40 (size 32):
  comm "syz-executor927", pid 7193, jiffies 4294941655 (age 19.840s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<00000000f67036ea>] kmemleak_alloc_recursive include/linux/kmemleak.h:43 [inline]
    [<00000000f67036ea>] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:586 [inline]
    [<00000000f67036ea>] slab_alloc mm/slab.c:3320 [inline]
    [<00000000f67036ea>] __do_kmalloc mm/slab.c:3654 [inline]
    [<00000000f67036ea>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x165/0x300 mm/slab.c:3671
    [<00000000fab0cc8e>] kmemdup+0x27/0x60 mm/util.c:127
    [<00000000d9992e0a>] kmemdup include/linux/string.h:453 [inline]
    [<00000000d9992e0a>] em_nbyte_change+0x5b/0x90 net/sched/em_nbyte.c:32
    [<000000007e04f711>] tcf_em_validate net/sched/ematch.c:241 [inline]
    [<000000007e04f711>] tcf_em_tree_validate net/sched/ematch.c:359 [inline]
    [<000000007e04f711>] tcf_em_tree_validate+0x332/0x46f net/sched/ematch.c:300
    [<000000007a769204>] basic_set_parms net/sched/cls_basic.c:157 [inline]
    [<000000007a769204>] basic_change+0x1d7/0x5f0 net/sched/cls_basic.c:219
    [<00000000e57a5997>] tc_new_tfilter+0x566/0xf70 net/sched/cls_api.c:2104
    [<0000000074b68559>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3b2/0x4b0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:5415
    [<00000000b7fe53fb>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x61/0x170 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2477
    [<00000000e83a40d0>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x1d/0x30 net/core/rtnetlink.c:5442
    [<00000000d62ba933>] netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1302 [inline]
    [<00000000d62ba933>] netlink_unicast+0x223/0x310 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1328
    [<0000000088070f72>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2c0/0x570 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1917
    [<00000000f70b15ea>] sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:639 [inline]
    [<00000000f70b15ea>] sock_sendmsg+0x54/0x70 net/socket.c:659
    [<00000000ef95a9be>] ____sys_sendmsg+0x2d0/0x300 net/socket.c:2330
    [<00000000b650f1ab>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x8a/0xd0 net/socket.c:2384
    [<0000000055bfa74a>] __sys_sendmsg+0x80/0xf0 net/socket.c:2417
    [<000000002abac183>] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2426 [inline]
    [<000000002abac183>] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2424 [inline]
    [<000000002abac183>] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x23/0x30 net/socket.c:2424

Fixes: 1da177e4

 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by:  <syzbot+03c4738ed29d5d366ddf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>