Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Select Git revision
  • 667510a9b3712cfa39fed502c04fd9f5550e5fc6
  • master default
  • kci-gitlab
  • gitlab-draft
  • v4l2/ext-api/wip-v7
  • v4l2/ext-api/v6
  • v4l2/ext-api/wip-v6
  • rockchip/isp/destage
  • rockchip-5-8-backport
  • rockchip_upstream
  • rkisp1_tmp
  • rockchip/isp/multistream-rkisp1
  • v4l2/ext-api/wip-v5
  • v4l2/ext-api/rfc-v4
  • v4l2/ext-api/wip-v4
  • aratiu_test
  • rockchip/isp/dt-bindings
  • chromeos/dafna_rkisp1-stats-in-isr
  • rockchip/isp/wip
  • rockchip/isp/tinkerboard
  • rockchip/isp/multistream
21 results

build-kernel.sh

Blame
    • Helen Koike's avatar
      667510a9
      kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing · 667510a9
      Helen Koike authored
      
      This patch introduces a `.gitlab-ci` file along with a `ci/` folder,
      defininga basic test pipeline triggered by code pushes to a GitLab-CI
      instance. This initial version includes static checks (checkpatch and
      smatch for now) and build tests across various architectures and
      configurations. It leverages an integrated cache for efficient build
      times and introduces a flexible 'scenarios' mechanism for
      subsystem-specific extensions.
      
      [ci: add prerequisites to run check-patch on MRs]
      Co-developed-by: default avatarTales Aparecida <tales.aparecida@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarTales Aparecida <tales.aparecida@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarHelen Koike <helen.koike@collabora.com>
      
      ---
      
      Hey all,
      
      You can check the validation of this patch on: https://gitlab.collabora.com/koike/linux/-/pipelines/86841
      
      I would appreciate your feedback on this work, what do you think?
      
      If you would rate from 0 to 5, where:
      
      [ ] 0. I don't think this is useful at all, and I doubt it will ever be. It doesn't seem worthwhile.
      [ ] 1. I don't find it useful in its current form.
      [ ] 2. It might be useful to others, but not for me.
      [ ] 3. It has potential, but it's not yet something I can incorporate into my workflow.
      [ ] 4. This is useful, but it needs some adjustments before I can include it in my workflow.
      [ ] 5. This is really useful! I'm eager to start using it right away. Why didn't you send this earlier? :)
      
      Which rating would you select?
      667510a9
      History
      kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
      Helen Koike authored
      
      This patch introduces a `.gitlab-ci` file along with a `ci/` folder,
      defininga basic test pipeline triggered by code pushes to a GitLab-CI
      instance. This initial version includes static checks (checkpatch and
      smatch for now) and build tests across various architectures and
      configurations. It leverages an integrated cache for efficient build
      times and introduces a flexible 'scenarios' mechanism for
      subsystem-specific extensions.
      
      [ci: add prerequisites to run check-patch on MRs]
      Co-developed-by: default avatarTales Aparecida <tales.aparecida@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarTales Aparecida <tales.aparecida@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarHelen Koike <helen.koike@collabora.com>
      
      ---
      
      Hey all,
      
      You can check the validation of this patch on: https://gitlab.collabora.com/koike/linux/-/pipelines/86841
      
      I would appreciate your feedback on this work, what do you think?
      
      If you would rate from 0 to 5, where:
      
      [ ] 0. I don't think this is useful at all, and I doubt it will ever be. It doesn't seem worthwhile.
      [ ] 1. I don't find it useful in its current form.
      [ ] 2. It might be useful to others, but not for me.
      [ ] 3. It has potential, but it's not yet something I can incorporate into my workflow.
      [ ] 4. This is useful, but it needs some adjustments before I can include it in my workflow.
      [ ] 5. This is really useful! I'm eager to start using it right away. Why didn't you send this earlier? :)
      
      Which rating would you select?
    build-kernel.sh 986 B
    #!/bin/bash
    # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
    #
    # Copyright (C) 2024 Collabora, Helen Koike <helen.koike@collabora.com>
    
    set -exo pipefail
    
    source ci/gitlab-ci/ci-scripts/ici-functions.sh
    
    ici_prepare_build
    
    pushd build
    
    # compile the entire kernel
    make CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__ -C "$ICI_KERNEL_DIR" O=$(pwd) -j$(nproc) 2>&1 | tee output.txt
    
    export INSTALL_PATH="${CI_PROJECT_DIR}/artifacts/kernel-install-${KCI_KERNEL_ARCH}-${KCI_DEFCONFIG}_config"
    mkdir -p "$INSTALL_PATH"
    
    # install the kernel image to artifacts/kernel-install
    make -C "$ICI_KERNEL_DIR" O=$(pwd) install INSTALL_PATH="$INSTALL_PATH"
    
    # install kernel modules to artifacts/kernel-install
    make -C "$ICI_KERNEL_DIR" O=$(pwd) modules_install INSTALL_MOD_PATH="$INSTALL_PATH"
    
    # export config as artifact
    cp .config "${CI_PROJECT_DIR}/artifacts/${KCI_KERNEL_ARCH}-${KCI_DEFCONFIG}_config"
    
    # if the compilation has warnings, exit with the warning code
    if grep -iq "warning" output.txt; then
        exit 101
    fi
    
    popd