Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Select Git revision
  • 667510a9b3712cfa39fed502c04fd9f5550e5fc6
  • master default
  • kci-gitlab
  • gitlab-draft
  • v4l2/ext-api/wip-v7
  • v4l2/ext-api/v6
  • v4l2/ext-api/wip-v6
  • rockchip/isp/destage
  • rockchip-5-8-backport
  • rockchip_upstream
  • rkisp1_tmp
  • rockchip/isp/multistream-rkisp1
  • v4l2/ext-api/wip-v5
  • v4l2/ext-api/rfc-v4
  • v4l2/ext-api/wip-v4
  • aratiu_test
  • rockchip/isp/dt-bindings
  • chromeos/dafna_rkisp1-stats-in-isr
  • rockchip/isp/wip
  • rockchip/isp/tinkerboard
  • rockchip/isp/multistream
21 results

linux.code-workspace

  • Helen Koike's avatar
    667510a9
    kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing · 667510a9
    Helen Koike authored
    
    This patch introduces a `.gitlab-ci` file along with a `ci/` folder,
    defininga basic test pipeline triggered by code pushes to a GitLab-CI
    instance. This initial version includes static checks (checkpatch and
    smatch for now) and build tests across various architectures and
    configurations. It leverages an integrated cache for efficient build
    times and introduces a flexible 'scenarios' mechanism for
    subsystem-specific extensions.
    
    [ci: add prerequisites to run check-patch on MRs]
    Co-developed-by: default avatarTales Aparecida <tales.aparecida@redhat.com>
    Signed-off-by: default avatarTales Aparecida <tales.aparecida@redhat.com>
    Signed-off-by: default avatarHelen Koike <helen.koike@collabora.com>
    
    ---
    
    Hey all,
    
    You can check the validation of this patch on: https://gitlab.collabora.com/koike/linux/-/pipelines/86841
    
    I would appreciate your feedback on this work, what do you think?
    
    If you would rate from 0 to 5, where:
    
    [ ] 0. I don't think this is useful at all, and I doubt it will ever be. It doesn't seem worthwhile.
    [ ] 1. I don't find it useful in its current form.
    [ ] 2. It might be useful to others, but not for me.
    [ ] 3. It has potential, but it's not yet something I can incorporate into my workflow.
    [ ] 4. This is useful, but it needs some adjustments before I can include it in my workflow.
    [ ] 5. This is really useful! I'm eager to start using it right away. Why didn't you send this earlier? :)
    
    Which rating would you select?
    667510a9
    History
    kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
    Helen Koike authored
    
    This patch introduces a `.gitlab-ci` file along with a `ci/` folder,
    defininga basic test pipeline triggered by code pushes to a GitLab-CI
    instance. This initial version includes static checks (checkpatch and
    smatch for now) and build tests across various architectures and
    configurations. It leverages an integrated cache for efficient build
    times and introduces a flexible 'scenarios' mechanism for
    subsystem-specific extensions.
    
    [ci: add prerequisites to run check-patch on MRs]
    Co-developed-by: default avatarTales Aparecida <tales.aparecida@redhat.com>
    Signed-off-by: default avatarTales Aparecida <tales.aparecida@redhat.com>
    Signed-off-by: default avatarHelen Koike <helen.koike@collabora.com>
    
    ---
    
    Hey all,
    
    You can check the validation of this patch on: https://gitlab.collabora.com/koike/linux/-/pipelines/86841
    
    I would appreciate your feedback on this work, what do you think?
    
    If you would rate from 0 to 5, where:
    
    [ ] 0. I don't think this is useful at all, and I doubt it will ever be. It doesn't seem worthwhile.
    [ ] 1. I don't find it useful in its current form.
    [ ] 2. It might be useful to others, but not for me.
    [ ] 3. It has potential, but it's not yet something I can incorporate into my workflow.
    [ ] 4. This is useful, but it needs some adjustments before I can include it in my workflow.
    [ ] 5. This is really useful! I'm eager to start using it right away. Why didn't you send this earlier? :)
    
    Which rating would you select?