Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. May 23, 2021
  2. May 19, 2021
  3. May 17, 2021
  4. May 12, 2021
  5. May 11, 2021
  6. May 07, 2021
  7. May 05, 2021
  8. May 04, 2021
  9. May 03, 2021
  10. Apr 30, 2021
    • Marc Dionne's avatar
      afs, rxrpc: Add Marc Dionne as co-maintainer · c5197b4e
      Marc Dionne authored
      
      Add Marc Dionne as a co-maintainer for kafs and rxrpc.
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMarc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      c5197b4e
    • Lukas Bulwahn's avatar
      MAINTAINERS: assign pagewalk.h to MEMORY MANAGEMENT · a3ddd79a
      Lukas Bulwahn authored
      Patch series "kernel-doc and MAINTAINERS clean-up".
      
      Roughly 900 warnings of about 21.000 kernel-doc warnings in the kernel
      tree warn with 'cannot understand function prototype:', i.e., the
      kernel-doc parser cannot parse the function's signature.  The majority,
      about 600 cases of those, are just struct definitions following the
      kernel-doc description.  Further, spot-check investigations suggest that
      the authors of the specific kernel-doc descriptions simply were not
      aware that the general format for a kernel-doc description for a
      structure requires to prefix the struct name with the keyword 'struct',
      as in 'struct struct_name - Brief description.'.  Details on kernel-doc
      are at the Link below.
      
      Without the struct keyword, kernel-doc does not check if the kernel-doc
      description fits to the actual struct definition in the source code.
      Fortunately, in roughly a quarter of these cases, the kernel-doc
      description is actually complete wrt.  its corresponding struct
      definition.  So, the trivial change adding the struct keyword will allow
      us to keep the kernel-doc descriptions more consistent for future
      changes, by checking for new kernel-doc warnings.
      
      Also, some of the files in ./include/ are not assigned to a specific
      MAINTAINERS section and hence have no dedicated maintainer.  So, if
      needed, the files in ./include/ are also assigned to the fitting
      MAINTAINERS section, as I need to identify whom to send the clean-up
      patch anyway.
      
      Here is the change from this kernel-doc janitorial work in the
      ./include/ directory for MEMORY MANAGEMENT.
      
      This patch (of 2):
      
      Commit a520110e ("mm: split out a new pagewalk.h header from mm.h")
      adds a new file in ./include/linux, but misses to update MAINTAINERS
      accordingly.  Hence,
      
        ./scripts/get_maintainers.pl include/linux/pagewalk.h
      
      points only to lkml as general fallback for all files, whereas the
      original include/linux/mm.h clearly marks this file part of MEMORY
      MANAGEMENT.
      
      Assign include/linux/pagewalk.h to MEMORY MANAGEMENT.
      
      Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210322122542.15072-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com
      Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210322122542.15072-2-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com
      
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
      Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
      Cc: Ralf Ramsauer <ralf.ramsauer@oth-regensburg.de>
      Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      a3ddd79a
  11. Apr 29, 2021
  12. Apr 25, 2021
  13. Apr 24, 2021
  14. Apr 23, 2021
  15. Apr 22, 2021
  16. Apr 21, 2021
  17. Apr 20, 2021
  18. Apr 19, 2021
  19. Apr 17, 2021
  20. Apr 16, 2021
  21. Apr 15, 2021
  22. Apr 14, 2021
Loading