Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Sep 09, 2017
  2. Sep 04, 2017
  3. Aug 17, 2017
    • Paul E. McKenney's avatar
      ipc: Replace spin_unlock_wait() with lock/unlock pair · e0892e08
      Paul E. McKenney authored
      
      There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics,
      and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock
      pair.  This commit therefore replaces the spin_unlock_wait() call in
      exit_sem() with spin_lock() followed immediately by spin_unlock().
      This should be safe from a performance perspective because exit_sem()
      is rarely invoked in production.
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
      Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
      Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Acked-by: default avatarManfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
      e0892e08
  4. Aug 03, 2017
  5. Jul 16, 2017
  6. Jul 12, 2017
Loading