Fix FTBFS in Debian unstable
Merge request reports
Activity
- Resolved by Lucas Kanashiro
@alee I do not think so. Call
ruby
orruby2.5
has the same effect,ruby
is always a symlink to some specific version, in stretchruby -> ruby2.3
and in busterruby -> ruby2.5
. And we do not have two versions of ruby at the same time in the same release (just during the transition). I chose use non-versioned ruby call to avoid patch updates in the future (and FTBFS). If the rails app breaks with that specific ruby version we have to fix it as we are doing now.In such case, can we have versioned ruby depends in
debian/control
instead? As I didn't use the versioned ruby as depends, so that folks who that removed ruby2.3 didn't detected the rdepends foropen-build-service
package.BTW, this patch and discuss we should move to debian's git repo as it's a FTBFS fix in Debian. Not for CCU's OBS.
@kanashiro Would you mind to close this merge request and use one on salsa.d.o instead? Thanks